Posted on


The Communications Authority of Kenya Authority’s lawyer Wambua Kilonzo at Milimani law court.

Equity Bank will know whether it will roll out its Thin Sim technology next year when the court will make it verdict over the controversial Thin sim card technology which it new service was challenged in court.
This is after the Communications Authority of Kenya tendered their response at the court and asked Justice Lenaola to dismiss the case saying that the Petition ought not to have been entertained since Kenya mobile telephone market is liberalized.
Data specialist Bernard Murage moved to court in October this year seeking orders from the court to stop the roll out of the Thin Sim technology. Murage argued that he might lose his personal data if the technology introduced by Equity Bank starts operating.
His suit is anchored on the fact that Equity Bank was given the green light by regulators to roll-out the technology on a one year trial basis, without providing any safeguard to protect the vulnerability of over 8 million account holders and their personal data.
However, Communications Authority of Kenya who gave Equity the go ahead while opposing the suit said that the market in Kenya is liberal and the consumer has choices to make from the available products.
The Authority’s lawyer Wambua Kilonzo says CA together with Central Bank of Kenya has sanctioned the roll out and in case of any vulnerability the license will be withdrawn immediately. Wambua noted that CA acted on recommendations by the Global Systems Mobile Association that provided the THIN SIM does not undermine security then there is no reason to worry. Taiwan-based SIM manufacturer Taisys Technologies was contracted to supply the THIN SIMs.
Mr Daniel Murage argued that the Communications Authority of Kenya has allowed the bank, through its subsidiary, Finserve Africa Ltd, to roll out the service for a one-year trial period without following due process.
“The bank intends to subject its customers to the service without providing any safeguard to the vulnerability and safety of (the) personal data of the account holders in their possession since the system’s vulnerability is at high risk,” said Mr Murage.
Mr Murage, who claimed to be an account holder with Equity Bank, said the risk is further compounded by the lack of data-protection laws in Kenya and the bank’s failure to adhere to data-protection policies approved by the Cabinet.
He added that the absence of the laws would allow third parties to easily access customers’ personal data, including the account numbers and amount of money they have.
“The technology poses real risk of contamination of private data and transmission to third parties without (the) consent of primary customers and account holders. The transmission of data to third parties is a simple procedure that can be done by anyone without the necessary regulations,” said Murage.
According to Mr Murage, CAK and Equity Bank have disregarded the safety concerns raised by other mobile phone providers and the parliamentary committee on technology.
He submitted that CAK and the bank have ignored advice to wait for data-protection laws to be adopted and that to date they have not offered any assurance to customers that their data will be safeguarded.
“The bank has entered into various contractual engagements of transmission with other entities without consulting the account holders. It will make other people easily access our loans, cash, bank statements and assets without our knowledge,” said Murage.
He added that in the absence of data-protection laws, he would have no redress in the event that someone intrudes into his privacy by accessing his bank data information.
Mr Murage alleged that the former CAK director-general is the current chairman of Finserve Africa Ltd, which he said had made the company exempt from having to comply with various telecommunication rules and regulations.
He wants the court to restrain Equity Bank from conducting a one-year trial of the thin-SIM technology until pending issues on data protection are addressed.
Mr Murage’s suit is the second petition challenging the bank’s flagship mobile money transfer services.
The Consumers Federation of Kenya (Cofek) in June sought to cancel the Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO) licence granted to the bank, arguing that CAK did not follow the right procedure in issuing the licence to Finserve Africa Ltd.
According to Cofek, CAK allocated the licence in an opaque manner without any public tender or public consultation, and that consumers were suspicious since there was no assurance that consumers would be safeguarded from bad services associated with mobile money service providers.
Cofek alleged that the process raised security questions, especially fears about money laundering in the event of fraudulent transactions.
The Bank will know it fate on 22nd of January 2015 on whether it will be given the green-light to roll out its Thin Sim technology on 22 January next year when Justice Lenaola is expected to deliver his verdict on the matter.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s